FEATURE:
Forty Years of the Compact Disc
PHOTO CREDIT: Jorge Fakhouri Filho/Pexels
Could We See a New Physical Format for the Modern Age?
_________
THE compact disc…
PHOTO CREDIT: cottonbro studio/Pexels
has been in our music world for forty years. Introduced in November 1982 in Japan, and in March 1983 in Europe, I wanted to mark forty years of its life here (in Europe) by thinking about its huge impact and legacy. I think that the compact disc was the last sustainable physical format. The cassette and vinyl came about before. Whereas cassettes are still used, as I have said before, they are hardly ever played. People don’t really have boomboxes or a devices they would have had in the ‘90s. It seems like many buy them to support artists. I do wonder where people play cassettes. I have also said how it would be awesome to revive the Sony Walkman and actually have a portable device one could play the cassettes on. I have always liked them, but I get that people feel they are pretty unstable in terms of durability. Whereas you get the dreaded unspooling and the tape being stuck in the machine, you also have to wind and rewind manually to skip between tracks. The vinyl has its advantages. You get this big and tactile product that you put on and enjoy. It is not portable obviously…and vinyl is still expensive. People deride the compact disc now, as a lot of the packaging used to house albums is plastic. Many feel C.D.s are too fragile and scratch easily. Also, like the cassette, where do people play compact discs?! I have a player in my car, but many do not now.
PHOTO CREDIT: freepik
Smartphones mean people hook that up in their car. Maybe people have stereos with a compact disc tray(s), but sales have steadily declined. Vinyl is the leading physical format, and that lacks a certain portability and sociability. In the sense people don’t swap vinyl in the way cassettes and C.D.s once were. The reason why the fortieth anniversary of the compact disc is so important is that it was the way that I properly discovered music. My parents’ vinyl was part of the house but it not widely played. I did do cassettes for a while when I was very young, and I do have very fond memories of playing albums in an old boombox that I got. Compact discs were a different league. I bought singles and albums, and there was a lot of swapping in the playground. The thrill of buying compact discs and taking them in. The feel of the casing and reading the inset you got too. I collected them too, and I have a vast array from across the years. They are memories and physical connections to past times. I am not against streaming and digital music, but it is convenient and inexpensive. I don’t think that sharing playlists and songs in this form is going to be as effective as physical forms. What do young music lovers do when it comes to having that same sort of connection and experience as I did when I was young?
IMAGE CREDIT: freepik
It is not just a concern about young listeners. It is a pleasure to listen to music in physical formats. Streaming is great but, with criticism regarding how much artists receive and very slow progress, people are embracing vinyl more than compact discs and cassettes. The format is expensive and very much for a time and place. One is unlikely to have vinyl shared in playground and workplaces. There is a romance and wonder to listening to vinyl and that whole listening experience. What do you do when you not only want to enjoy something more compact and cheaper, but it also need to be environmentally conscious and ensures artists receive payment. Also, I miss singles being available to purchase physically. It may seem oldskool, but the fortieth anniversary of the compact disc has made me wonder whether we could have a new physical format. The fairly short-lived MiniDisc (MD) came out in 1992, but that did not really have the same impact as C.D.s, cassettes, and vinyl. With there not really being a popular, easily accessible, and inexpensive physical format out there, I fear so many will miss out. There is already an awareness when it comes to younger listeners not knowing certain artists and songs. If streaming is their main source of discovery, the way algorithms work mean they are being fed limits and music that is crafted for them. There is a clear demand for physical music today.
PHOTO CREDIT: halayalex via freepik
I am not sure what the solution is, but I would like to think physical singles could be reignited (with artists more compelled to do B-sides), alongside physical albums on a new format. Something more durable than cassettes, it would be a cross between a compact disc and a MiniDisc. You need a device which is sturdy, well-designed, and compact, and you need the physical cartridge/product to be sized so that it is not too cumbersome. I love the old C.D. cases you got, but you would need to make the thing in a form other than plastic. Same goes with casing. I guess that is where the first challenge comes in. Also, it would need to be so that albums cost about the same as they do on C.D. Of course, if they could be priced the same as cassettes – which are slightly cheaper in general -, then that would take care of another issue. Not only would a new generation both be able to swap music like we did years back, in a physical and more sociable way. There would be this sense of preservation and posterity. I revisit and rediscover older music because I have the C.D.s, vinyl, or cassettes still. I am not going through playlists and being ignited and reminded in the same way. Also, as a way of passing music down, maybe there is not the same nostalgia and beauty of a cassette, vinyl, or compact disc, but there is physical archive and connection. That is so important. Being able to produce albums ethically and sustainably so they are durable, between £10-£12 (singles maybe £2-£3), and they are small enough to fit inside cases or a bag.
PHOTO CREDIT: Yuri Manei/Pexels
Some might argue why we need an additional physical format, but I feel compact discs, in spite of enduring for forty years, are less popular and seen as old-fashionable by some. I love cassettes and would recommend them, but they have design flaws and limitations. There are no devices to play them on and, if they were, would people buy it at such a high price? Something sleek that would mix digital interactivity with the physical product and capabilities would combine the best of the digital and physical. Perhaps the device itself would be upwards of £100 but, as many would spend them on a record player, the investment is sound. It would be less problematic than the Sony Discman (which used to skip C.D.s if you so much as moved with it!), and it would enable new generations to bond with physical music in a very real way. I am not sure how practical and easy it would be to press old and new albums onto this format, but I would definitely buy more older and new albums if there was a format that was more affordable than vinyl (and one I could walk around with). It provides nostalgia and modernity at the same time. Using a material other than plastic and ensuring people could afford the device and albums/singles. I would hate to think that, in years to come, the only physical format we have is vinyl. It is a marvellous thing, but it really is for sitting at home. I think it is something for doing solo. Digital music has opened so many horizons and possibilities for so many people. I can understand why some physical formats are dwindling, but it needs to be kept alive. Having music that you can hold in your hands and play is…
PHOTO CREDIT: freepik
SUCH a precious thing.